Hiindex LOGO

Research Article

A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model


Author(s): T. Pathinathan , A.Kirupa
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Loyola College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Year of Publication: 2014
Source: International Journal of Computing Algorithm
     
×

Scholarly Article Identity Link


HTML:

<a href="http://www.hindex.org/2014/article.php?page=576"><img src="http://www.hindex.org/sai.php/2014SCIA316F0576" alt="SAI"></a>


File:

http://www.hindex.org/2014/p576.pdf


Citation: T. Pathinathan, A.Kirupa. "A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model." International Journal of Computing Algorithm 3.1 (2014): 22-25.

Abstract:
We do come across cases where the lower court verdict is reversal or appealed by higher court. This paper studiesthe differences in judgment delivered at lower and higher court on a family divorce case. This case consists ofthree stages. First stage is in family court, Hyderabad by wife Deepa against her husbandK. Srinivas Rao. Secondcase is of the wife D.A Deepa challenged the family court Judgement in the High court, Andhra Pradesh. And finally they approached Supreme Court for decree of divorce. The Criminal proceedings in family court and later appeal and further revision were pursued in higher forums whichwould warrant grant of divorce. The differences in judgment in different courts are studied using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model.


Keywords Fuzzy preference ordering, Group decision making, reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, Decision making process.


  • BibTex
  • Reference
  • XML
  • JSON
  • Dublin Core
  • CSL

@article{ASt1457622, author = {T. Pathinathan,A.Kirupa}, title = {A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model}, journal={International Journal of Computing Algorithm}, volume={3}, issue={1}, issn = {2278-2397}, year = {2014}, publisher = {Scholarly Citation Index Analytics-SCIA}

  • [1] George J. Klir and Bo Yuan, (2008), Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, pp: 390-394.
  • [2] Chen, S.M, (1997), A New Method for Tool Steel Materials Selection under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp: 92, 265–274.
  • [3] Liang, G.S., Wang, M.J, (1991), A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method for Facility Site Selection, International Journal of Production Research, pp: 29, 2313– 2330 CrossRef.
  • [4] Liang, G.S., Wang, M.J, (1993), A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Robot Selection, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , pp: 10,267–274 CrossRef.
  • [5] Karsak, E.E, (1998), A Two-phase Robot Selection Procedure, Production Planning and Control, pp: 675–684CrossRef.
  • [6] Yeh, C.H., Deng, H., Chang, Y.H, (2000), Fuzzy Multi-criteria Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Bus Companies, European Journal of Operational Research. pp: 126, 459– 473CrossRef.
  • [7] Chian-son, Y.: AGP-AHP, (2002), Method for Solving Group Decision-Making Fuzzy AHP Problems, Computers and Operations Research.
  • [8] M. Alavi, (1994), “Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation,”MIS Quarterly, 18, pp. 159-174.
  • [9] K. J. Arrow, (1963)Social Choice and Individual Values. Second edition, New York: Wiley.
  • [10] M. S. Baas and H. Kwakernaak,(1977), “Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets,” Automatica, 13, pp. 47-58.
  • [11] Banerjee, (1994), "Fuzzy preferences and Arrow-type problems," Social Choice and Welfare, 11, 1, pp. 121-130.
  • [12] Banerjee, (1995), "Fuzzy choice functions, revealed preference and rationality," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 70, pp. 31-43.
  • [13] R. E. Bellman and L. A. Zadeh, (1970), “Decision making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science, 17, 4, pp. 141-164..
  • [14] Dutta, (1987), "Fuzzy preferences and social choice," Mathematical Social Science, 13, pp. 215-229.

  • <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <record> <language>eng</language> <journalTitle>International Journal of Computing Algorithm</journalTitle> <eissn>2278-2397 </eissn> <publicationDate>2014</publicationDate> <volume>3</volume> <issue>1</issue> <startPage>22</startPage> <endPage>25</endPage> <documentType>article</documentType> <title language='eng'>A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model</title> <authors> <author> <name>T. Pathinathan</name> </author> </authors> <abstract language='eng'>We do come across cases where the lower court verdict is reversal or appealed by higher court. This paper studiesthe differences in judgment delivered at lower and higher court on a family divorce case. This case consists ofthree stages. First stage is in family court, Hyderabad by wife Deepa against her husbandK. Srinivas Rao. Secondcase is of the wife D.A Deepa challenged the family court Judgement in the High court, Andhra Pradesh. And finally they approached Supreme Court for decree of divorce. The Criminal proceedings in family court and later appeal and further revision were pursued in higher forums whichwould warrant grant of divorce. The differences in judgment in different courts are studied using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model.</abstract> <fullTextUrl format='pdf'>http://www.hindex.org/2014/p576.pdf</fullTextUrl> <keywords language='eng'> <keyword>Fuzzy preference ordering, Group decision making, reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, Decision making process.</keyword> </keywords> </record>

    { "@context":"http://schema.org", "@type":"publication-article","identifier":"http://www.hindex.org/2014/article.php?page=576", "name":"A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model", "author":[{"name":"T. Pathinathan "}], "datePublished":"2014", "description":"We do come across cases where the lower court verdict is reversal or appealed by higher court. This paper studiesthe differences in judgment delivered at lower and higher court on a family divorce case. This case consists ofthree stages. First stage is in family court, Hyderabad by wife Deepa against her husbandK. Srinivas Rao. Secondcase is of the wife D.A Deepa challenged the family court Judgement in the High court, Andhra Pradesh. And finally they approached Supreme Court for decree of divorce. The Criminal proceedings in family court and later appeal and further revision were pursued in higher forums whichwould warrant grant of divorce. The differences in judgment in different courts are studied using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model.", "keywords":["Fuzzy preference ordering, Group decision making, reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, Decision making process."], "schemaVersion":"https://schema.org/version/3.3", "includedInDataCatalog":{ "@type":"DataCatalog", "name":"Scholarly Citation Index Analytics-SCIA", "url":"http://hindex.org"}, "publisher":{"@type":"Organization", "name":"Scientific Communications Research Academy" } }

    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"> <dc:contributor>A.Kirupa</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor></dc:contributor> <dc:contributor></dc:contributor> <dc:creator>T. Pathinathan</dc:creator> <dc:date>2014</dc:date> <dc:description>We do come across cases where the lower court verdict is reversal or appealed by higher court. This paper studiesthe differences in judgment delivered at lower and higher court on a family divorce case. This case consists ofthree stages. First stage is in family court, Hyderabad by wife Deepa against her husbandK. Srinivas Rao. Secondcase is of the wife D.A Deepa challenged the family court Judgement in the High court, Andhra Pradesh. And finally they approached Supreme Court for decree of divorce. The Criminal proceedings in family court and later appeal and further revision were pursued in higher forums whichwould warrant grant of divorce. The differences in judgment in different courts are studied using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model.</dc:description> <dc:identifier>2014SCIA316F0576</dc:identifier> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:title>A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model</dc:title> <dc:type>publication-article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>

    { "identifier": "2014SCIA316F0576", "abstract": "We do come across cases where the lower court verdict is reversal or appealed by higher court. This paper studiesthe differences in judgment delivered at lower and higher court on a family divorce case. This case consists ofthree stages. First stage is in family court, Hyderabad by wife Deepa against her husbandK. Srinivas Rao. Secondcase is of the wife D.A Deepa challenged the family court Judgement in the High court, Andhra Pradesh. And finally they approached Supreme Court for decree of divorce. The Criminal proceedings in family court and later appeal and further revision were pursued in higher forums whichwould warrant grant of divorce. The differences in judgment in different courts are studied using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model.", "author": [ { "family": "T. Pathinathan,A.Kirupa" } ], "id": "576", "issued": { "date-parts": [ [ 2014 ] ] }, "language": "eng", "publisher": "Scholarly Citation Index Analytics-SCIA", "title": " A Study on Differences in JudgmentBased on a Civil Case Using Fuzzy Multiperson Decision Making Model", "type": "publication-article", "version": "3" }